[PDF / Epub] ★ Chancellorsville 1863: The Souls of the Brave Author Ernest B. Furgurson – Transportjobsite.co.uk

Chancellorsville 1863: The Souls of the Brave files Chancellorsville 1863: The Souls of the Brave, read online Chancellorsville 1863: The Souls of the Brave, free Chancellorsville 1863: The Souls of the Brave, free Chancellorsville 1863: The Souls of the Brave, Chancellorsville 1863: The Souls of the Brave 5f053e94e For Years Historians And Military Strategists Have Been Obsessed By The Battle Of Chancellorsville It Began With An Audaciously Planned Stroke By Union General Joe Hooker As He Sent His Army Across The Rappahannock River And Around Robert E Lee S Lines It Ended With That Same Army Fleeing Back In Near Total Disarray And Hooker S Reputation In RuinsThis Splendid Account Of Chancellorsville The First In Than Years Explains Lee S Most Brilliant Victory Even As It Places The Battle Within The Larger Canvas Of The Civil War Drawing On A Wealth Of First Hand Sources, It Creates A Novelistic Chronicle Of Tactics And Characters While It Retraces Every Thrust And Parry Of The Two Armies And The Fateful Decisions Of Their Commanders, From Hooker S Glaring Display Of Moral Weakness To The Inspired Risk Taking Of Lee And Stonewall Jackson, Who Was Mortally Wounded By Friendly Fire At Once Impassioned And Gracefully Balanced, Chancellorsville Is A Grand Achievement In Civil War History


10 thoughts on “Chancellorsville 1863: The Souls of the Brave

  1. says:

    I truly enjoyed this book I read this because it was already in my Civil War library and I was about to embark on a tour of the Chancellorsville battlefield This was also my prep research for a conference on the generalship of Robert E Lee that I attended, which also included a detailed tour of the field I found this book very readable many battle histories get bogged down in crazy minutia and confusing militarese but not so with this history It is well written and researched and the text flows well.It is a good, and lesser known, companion to Sear s book on Chancellorsville


  2. says:

    Great book on the subject It fascinates me how the military leaders were able to see the terrain, develop battle plans and then maintain command and control during these battles The battle lines covered miles and maps were really made up on the fly by locals.


  3. says:

    A nicely told version of the campaign with ample references to soldiers journals and letters While containing details, the analysis was not as deep as in Sears Chancellorsville.


  4. says:

    Good, thorough examination of the Battle of Chancellorsville in the American Civil War Furgurson mixes in some first hand accounts from regular soldiers and lower level officers, somewhat like what Lyn MacDonald did in her excellent books about the British forces in World War I Particularly entertaining are the Union officers remarks about General Hooker and his drinking habits.Those habits are key, because as the book makes clear spoiler alert if you don t know much about the ACW , Hooker started the battle with an excellent plan, and executed its opening stages masterfully Then he completely goes to pieces, missing chance after chance after chance to destroy Lee s army or damage it severely, at least It certainly shows you just how risky Lee s position was, and how things could have turned out quite differently at many junctures Except, you know, Hooker was probably drunk most of the time.Anyway, it s well written and researched, though occasionally the first hand reports are a bit forced into the text not always as enlightening or connected as Furgurson would have you believe but again, it s a worthy effort and very readable He dances around slavery as much as you d expect for a Virginian ah, the old state s rights tale but at least acknowledges that after the Emancipation Proclamation, there s no way anyone could argue the war was about anything but slavery He s also appropriately tough on Lee where he comes up short the larger picture of the war not wanting to send troops west and for getting overconfident in his troops and officers after Chancellorsville, which of course leads to disaster at Gettysburg Ewell in particular incurs Furgurson s wrath.Occasionally Furgurson veers near hagiography, showing a bit too much love for Jackson, Lee, and most especially Jeb Stuart, whom Furgurson calls the most celebrated or some such adjective American cavalry officer of all time, a claim that I m sure George Armstrong Custer would take issue with.My only other gripe is the one I have for many military histories the maps frequently neglect to lablel the units you are reading about on the connected pages It d sure help to make sure the units mentioned are on the dang maps Maybe the map makers didn t know where they were I have no idea.Overall this is an excellent history, and I wish I d read it right after my trip to Chancellorsville and Fredericksburg there s nothing like seeing the stone wall and Marye s Heights, and thinking about running across that horrible field, but such is life It s a great book One other important factoid that Furgurson notes but doesn t make much of is the comparative losses in the battle Though Chancellorsville is generally seen as a great victory for the Confederacy and disaster for the Union, Furgurson correctly notes that Lee lost about 20% of his forces in the battle and Hooker about 12% The Union could afford those losses, terrible as they were, and Lee could not Technically speaking, in the war of attrition the Civil War would eventually become, Chancellorsville was pretty much a Union victory.


  5. says:

    This one goes on my top ten Civil War list Yes, it is a battle study, but it is a narrative history, not just a tactical study of the battle of Chancellorsville Not only is Furgurson an engaging writer himself, but this book is peppered with first hand quotations that seamlessly pull the reader into the time and place The leaders, the foot soldiers, the local citizens, the countryside, and even the battlefield itself all come alive in his telling.Written twenty five years ago, Furgurson s broad historical interpretations have not all held up quite as well as his writing His take on Hooker in particular has been challenged in the intervening years Today, Hooker is broadly accepted as being concussed after the cannon ball shattered the pillar upon which he was leaning rather than the implication that he had relapsed into drinking during the battle That the battle was won through the moral superiority of Lee and Jackson against the moral inferiority of Hooker that was believed at the time, while not his major thesis was certainly not challenged by Furgurson In his celebration of Lee s celerity and audacity, he follows the Nineteenth Century s laudatory view of Southern leadership, yet he also proposes in the epilogue that Lee s faith in the Southern soldier s superior ability ultimately led to later defeat.


  6. says:

    Next to Stephen Sears Chancellorsville this is the best account of the campaign that I have read Ferguson provides enough background material on the major commanders and armies based on the previous Fredericksburg Campaign to give a smooth transition into this first major contest of 1863 in the Eastern Theater The author also liberally cites from letters, memoirs and on field communication reports.The common foot soldier as well as commanders get their due in this crisply written read The horrors of Civil war combat and its aftermath are keenly described while attention is paid to the topographical features which played such an important role Ferguson also weighs in with what I think is a fair assessment of Lee s and Hooker s performance as commanders Enough maps are included at the critical points to keep the reader grounded in what was an incredibly complicated and fluid engagement lasting almost a full week 28 reproductions of period drawings and photographs are also included.


  7. says:

    Alas, Chancellorsville 1863, I enjoyed your company greatly but left you for another I read Ernest B Furgurson s excellent account of possibly the most interesting Civil War battle well before Stephen Sears absolutely great Chancellorsville, written later Considering Sears book among the best Civil War battle campaign books ever written, I foolishly decided I needed only one Chancellorsville book and said goodbye to Furgurson s years ago, consigning it to a used bookstore and into other arms Sears book IS better, but that s a reflection of my Sears worship than a knock on Furgurson Someday I ll probably pick up this baby somewhere and read both again love, even for a side piece, never dies.


  8. says:

    This battle account is ranked No 5 on a list of all time best Civil War non fiction books and rightly so It is extremely detailed but that aids in allowing the reader to perceive the battle as it took place over a period of three days Alan and I found it of interest because we both had great grandfathers who were killed in this battle his on the Union side and mine on the Confederate The characters of Lee and Jackson are well drawn as is that of Hooker who ended up being castigated for his reluctance to attack and was blamed for the Union defeat.


  9. says:

    Furgurson s retelling of the familiar Chancellorsville story is an homage to the enlisted men who suffered through the epic campaign His best writing is a description of the titanic struggle for the Union breastworks on May 3, complete with vivid illustrations of combat that will follow the reader for days If his conclusion smacks of some trite and overly simplistic Gettysburg analysis, it nonetheless serves to tie together a tremendous story brilliantly told.


  10. says:

    This is a fresh, lucid and enjoyable treatment of the epic battle His ancestral ties to the battle brought out the best of his writing and reporter s talent Talents which seem to have been wasted combating the progressive atrophy of reason so often seen in the print of his one time employer, the Balti Sun.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *